ASSESSMENT OF PEDAGOGIES

Stankovic, N

[Stankovic, Nenad] Xian Jiaotong Liverpool Univ, Suzhou, Peoples R China.

4TH INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE (INTED 2010)

Pages:3808-3814

Publication Year:2010

Document Type:Conference Paper

Identifier:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12791/001469

Abstract

We report on our experience with two pedagogies over a two year period, using one approach in each academic year, but the learning outcome remained the same. The first approach, in the first year, was backed up by Ian Sommerville's textbook, and the second by Bruegge and Dutoit's. The students came from three different curricula, and the class size in the second year was three times that in the first year. The difference in the outcome and in the meeting of the learning outcome has been strongly in favour of the second pedagogy. In this paper we compare the outcomes, provide a number of examples that explain the issues that the students had to deal with, and how the change in the pedagogy has improved the quality of the laboratory work without changing the project framework itself.

Keywords

UML software engineering Object-oriented

Copyright 2006-2020 © Xi'an Jiaotong-Liverpool University 苏ICP备07016150号-1 京公网安备 11010102002019号